Legal Opinion

Strozewski v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1970No. 81-83PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffeknan, J.

The briefs of the parties make it apparent that the only question on this appeal is whether, in fact, the 1954 Oldsmobile driven by Larry was a “temporary substitute automobile.” “Temporary substitute automobile,” as defined in the policy of insurance:

“. . . means an automobile or trailer while temporarily used as a substitute for the owned automobile or trailer when withdrawn from normal use because of its breakdown, repair, servicing, loss or destruction.”

It is undisputed that the Buick had been withdrawn from normal use because it was in the garage for repair. The only question thus…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. BradleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sellers v. Allstate Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Derusha v. Iowa National Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Spaulding v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. Ranger Insurance v. Air-Speed, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API