Legal Opinion

City of Muskegon v. Irwin

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1971No. Docket 9190-9199PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMunro, J.

After several years of study and planning the City Commission of the City of Muskegon, pursuant to the provisions of PA 1945, No 344, as amended (MCLA § 125.71 et seq. [Stat Ann 1969 Rev § 5.3501 et seq.]), adopted an urban renewal plan designating an urban renewal area, the ordinance being passed on October 8, 1968. On September 23, 1969, the city commission declared defendants’ land was necessary to implement the urban renewal plan and authorized condemnation which was commenced December 15, 1969. Defendants are ten of the parties whose lands were to be condemned under the resolution of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re Petition of RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. City of Detroit v. Fidelity Realty Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. King v. PartridgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State Board of Education v. Von ZellenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1965
  5. Grand Rapids Board of Education v. BaczewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. City of Muskegon v. DeVriesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. City of Lansing v. Jury Rowe Realty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Nelson Drainage District v. FilippisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. State Highway Commission v. CronenwettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API