Legal Opinion
Miller v. Muscarelle
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided May 1, 1961PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
67 N.J. Super. 305 (1961)
170 A.2d 437
MARY MILLER, ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF RUSSELL MILLER, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH L. MUSCARELLE, CHARLES W. MUSCARELLE, GEORGE FIELDS, AND ARTHUR FOWLER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 14, 1961.
Decided May 1, 1961.
Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.
Mr. Raymond Chasan argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Warren, Chasan and Leyner, attorneys).
Mr. Theodore W. Geiser argued the cause for respondents Joseph L. Muscarelle and Charles W. Muscarelle (Messrs. Shaw, Pindar,…
2Cases cited75 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Caldarola v. EckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Rempfer v. Deerfield Packing Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Osborne v. MorganMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
- Coffer v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Millison v. E.I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Coyle v. Englander'sNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Badami v. GaertnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Volb v. G.E. Capital Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.