Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Yadkin River Power Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 20, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Peebles, J., at July Term, 1912, of Lee. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court by Mr. Chief Justice Ciarle.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, O. J.

This is an action for personal injury. The plaintiff’s witnesses testified that they were required by the foreman to work at night, digging' holes for the erection of steel towers. These holes were 2 by 4 feet and 6 to 7 feet deep. Four holes were being dug, and the plaintiff was digging in one of them when the blast was to be set off in two others. According to plaintiff’s testimony, the foreman started off with the only lantern, and said, “Come on out of the hole.” The plaintiff got out, and, when he did so, found that they had all gone with the light, and not knowing which way…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Winston-Salem Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  2. Morton v. Blades Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  3. Johnson v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  4. Gates County v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Palmer v. . LowderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Atkinson v. Corriher Mills Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Elliott v. Cranberry Furnace Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Davis v. . HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  5. Nissen v. . Mining CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1889

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API