Legal Opinion

Nissen v. . Mining Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1889PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The cause had been referred to Hon. John H. Dillard. Defendant filed exception to his report, and moved to submit certain issues to a jury. It appearing that defendant had made no objection to reference, had acted on it, and prayed for it in his answer, the court denied the motion. Defendant excepted.

The court overruled each exception, adopted the findings of fact and law of the referee, and confirmed the report, and rendered the final judgment. Appeal by defendant. The Constitution, Art. IV, sec. 13, provides: "In all issues of fact, joined in any court, the parties may waive the right to…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Cumming v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
  2. Ivey v. Cotton Mills.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Terry v. Danville, Mocksville & Southwestern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Grant v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  5. State ex rel. Armfield v. BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. American Contract Co. v. Bullen Bridge Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API