Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Corriher Mills Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 20, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdeN, J.

Is an employer liable for tbe injury of an employee sustained upon tbe premises of a third party while returning home from work, and using a frequented path across tbe property of such third party?

Tbe defendant owned tbe land over which tbe Southern Railway bad an easement of 200 feet in width. Tbe right of way, at tbe time of tbe injury, was used exclusively for railroad purposes and tbe spur track entering tbe enclosure of tbe mill was installed by tbe railway company and subject to its exclusive control. Tbe plaintiff used this spur track in returning to her home after working hours and in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Malden & Melrose Gas Light Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  2. Wilson v. Valley Improvement Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Lindgren v. William Bros Boiler Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  4. Kelly v. Yadkin River Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  5. Crawford v. Michael & Bivens, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shives v. SampleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Dravo Corporation v. CopelandMississippi Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Allen v. . Bessemer CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Allen v. . Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  5. Allen v. American Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API