Legal Opinion

City of Anchorage v. Thomas

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1981No. 4621PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOR, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether a municipality may retain proceeds from a *272tax foreclosure sale in excess of the amount owed by the property owner in taxes, interest and costs.

Justine Thomas owned real property in Anchorage from which she received a modest income. The Greater Anchorage Area Borough1 received a judgment for delinquent taxes on the property in April of 1974. The property was sold at a tax foreclosure sale on November 1, 1975, for $15,-000. The total amount which Mrs. Thomas owed the Borough, including interest, costs and attorney’s fees was $3,815.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Nelson v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Helms v. American Security Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Kelly v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  5. Oosterwyk v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kodiak Island Borough v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State, Department of Natural Resources v. PankratzAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Torkko/Korman/Engineers v. Penland VenturesAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Rogers & Babler, Div. of Mapco Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Richard Roberge v. ASRC Construction Holding Company and Arctic Slope Regional CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API