City of Anchorage v. Thomas
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
This case presents the issue of whether a municipality may retain proceeds from a *272tax foreclosure sale in excess of the amount owed by the property owner in taxes, interest and costs.
Justine Thomas owned real property in Anchorage from which she received a modest income. The Greater Anchorage Area Borough1 received a judgment for delinquent taxes on the property in April of 1974. The property was sold at a tax foreclosure sale on November 1, 1975, for $15,-000. The total amount which Mrs. Thomas owed the Borough, including interest, costs and attorney’s fees was $3,815.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Nelson v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Helms v. American Security Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
- Laborers & Hod Carriers Union, Local No. 341 v. GroothuisAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Kelly v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
- Oosterwyk v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kodiak Island Borough v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- State, Department of Natural Resources v. PankratzAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Torkko/Korman/Engineers v. Penland VenturesAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Rogers & Babler, Div. of Mapco Alaska v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1986
- Richard Roberge v. ASRC Construction Holding Company and Arctic Slope Regional CorporationAlaska Supreme Court · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.