Legal Opinion

Peck v. Eimco Process Equipment Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1987No. 20914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Associate Chief Justice:

This is an action by plaintiff Alma E. Peck challenging an Industrial Commission order denying him permanent total disability benefits. We reverse and remand.

While employed by Eimco Processing Equipment Company as an industrial maintenance mechanic, Peck suffered two com-pensable industrial injuries which resulted in permanent physical impairment. The first injury, on September 12, 1980, required surgery on Peck’s right knee and caused a two percent impairment of the body. The second injury, on December 29, 1982, necessitated surgery on Peck’s lower back and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Schober v. Mountain Bell TelephoneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. United Park City Mines Company v. PrescottUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Saenger v. Liberty Carton Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  5. Marshall v. INDUS. COM'N OF STATE OF UTAHUtah Supreme Court · 1984

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ameritemps, Inc. v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  2. Brown v. City of WichitaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
  3. Zimmerman v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1989
  4. Olsen v. LABOR COM'NCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API