Daniel v. State

1. An indictment for selling intoxicating liquor, in violation of the prohibition law of this State, need not name the person to whom the liquor was sold. This court declines to review and overrule previous decisions of the Court of Appeals to the same effect, or to request the Supreme Court to overrule numerous decisions of that court announcing the same ruling.

*800Decided November 12, 1912. Conviction of sale of liquor; from city court of LaG-range— Judge Eevill presiding. August 14, 1912. M. U. Mooiy, S. Holdemess, E. A. Jones, Arthur Greer, for plaintiff in error. Henry Reeves, solicitor,…