Legal Opinion

Manning v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 22, 1912No. 4388PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Indictment for sale of liquor; from Brooks superior court— Judge Thomas. July 18, 1912.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, C. J.

1. A ground in the motion for a new trial, alleging that “the court erred in refusing to grant movant a continuance of his case, in order that he might prepare same for trial,” without any specific showing as to why he was not prepared, and containing nothing but this general statement, raises no question for the determination of this court.

2. An objection to a juror because he is over sixty years of age is an objection propter defectum, and must be made before verdict. The decision in Burroughs v. State, 33 Ga. 403, which holds to the contrary of the above proposition, is in direct conflict…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Epps v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  3. Albany Phosphate Co. v. Hugger Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Costly v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Daniel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Lindsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API