Legal Opinion

Day v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 19, 1944No. 30366PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

(After stating the foregoing facts.) It is argued in the brief of the able counsel for the accused that the accusation as a whole, and especially counts one and three, were subject to the demurrers interposed, in that the accusation as drawn “failed to put the defendant on notice of just what he was charged with, and failed to give him sufficient information to enable him to prepare his defense;” and many cases are cited in support of that proposition. Counsel argues that if counts one and three are held to be good, then all defendants hereafter are deprived of the right to adequately prepare…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Sanders v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Woody v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  4. Bowen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933
  5. Burge, Jr. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GrubeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  2. State v. GatesUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Gower v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  4. Shorter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  5. Bennefield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API