Legal Opinion

Smookler v. Wheatfield Township

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 29, 1973No. Docket 14669PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs’ land is zoned agricultural and residential. They sought to have it rezoned for a mobile home park. Denial of the application for rezoning precipitated the present action for judicial relief on the basis that as applied to their land, the present zoning was an unlawful exercise of police power. The township zoning permits mobile home parks but no land has been allocated for such development. All previous requests for rezoning to permit mobile home parks have been denied.

The validity of the zoning which precludes plaintiffs from using their land for mobile home park use is dependent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bristow v. City of WoodhavenMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Green v. Lima TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ed Zaagman, Inc. v. City of KentwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Smookler v. Wheatfield TownshipMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Drettman v. MacOmb TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Wilkins v. Village of Birch RunMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API