Legal Opinion
STATE OF NY BY ABRAMS v. General Motors Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 21, 1982No. 82 Civ. 2600 (GLG)PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOETTEL, District Judge:
This action arises from consumer complaints about alleged defects in the General Motors (GM) Turbo Hydra-Matic 200 automatic transmission (THM 200). Suing under section 63(12) of the New York Executive Law, 1 the State of New York, by its Attorney General, alleges that GM has engaged in “repeated and persistent fraudulent and illegal business practices in connection with its sale, warranting, and repair of automobiles equipped with the [THM 200].” Complaint ¶ 3. It seeks restitution for aggrieved consumers and various forms of injunctive relief.
The State originally…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Alfred L. Snapp & Son, Inc. v. Puerto Rico Ex Rel. BarezSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Missouri Railroad & Warehouse CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Department of Fair Employment & Housing v. Lucent Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- In re Standard & Poor's Rating Agency LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Billy Wayne Broyles, Linn M. Broyles v. Herman D. Bayless, Tennessee Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Hood Ex Rel. Mississippi v. Microsoft Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.