Legal Opinion

Ventro v. Clinchfield Coal Corporation

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 28, 1958No. Record 4772PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.

In this suit instituted by Clinchfield Coal Corporation against James Ventro, Lee Dotson, Carlyle Browning, Verlin Browning, and Gerald Browning, defendants, it asserted ownership to all coal, other minerals, oil and mining rights in a tract of land on Bold Camp Creek in Wise county, Virginia, containing 175 acres. The object of the suit was to quiet and remove clouds from Clinchfield’s title to the coal, other minerals and oil occasioned by James Ventro’s claims under deeds and through alleged adverse possession, enjoin Ventro and his lessees from mining coal, and have an accounting for all…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Virginia Coal & Iron Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Bostic v. BosticSupreme Court of Virginia · 1957
  3. Nickels v. Kane's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1886
  4. Interstate Coal & Iron Co. v. Clintwood Coal & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Klingstein v. EagleSupreme Court of Virginia · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harry Martin, Zarnoff O. Samford and Martin Trailer Toters, Inc. v. Morgan Drive Away, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Yaquina Bay Timber & Logging Co. v. Shiny Rock Mining Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Smith v. Pittston CompanySupreme Court of Virginia · 1962
  4. J. Walter Wright Lumber Co. v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API