Conte v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
LAWRENCE J. O’NEILL, District Judge.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT TO PARTIES AND COUNSEL
Judges in the Eastern District of California carry the heaviest caseload in the nation, and this Court is unable to devote inordinate time and resources to individual cases and matters. This Court cannot address all arguments, evidence and matters raised by parties and addresses only the arguments, evidence and matters necessary to reach the decision in this order given the shortage of district judges and staff. The…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- (PC) Thompson v. GomezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Avalanche Funding, LLC v. ArifDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Beech v. San Joaquin CountyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- Clements v. T-Mobile USA, IncDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
- Evans v. JacobsenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.