Peeler v. South Carolina Helicopters, Inc.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Littlejohn, Justice:
We are called upon to determine whether the defendant-appellant R. J. Enstrom Corporation, a corporation chartered under the laws of the State of Michigan, and not domesticated in South Carolina, is subject to the jurisdiction of the South Carolina courts such that it may be sued in this State.
The question, as taken from appellant’s brief, is as follows “Did Appellant [Enstrom] have sufficient contacts with the State of South Carolina to sustain service of process upon it herein without offending ‘traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice’?”
The lower court…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Boney v. Trans-State Dredging Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
- Triplett Ex Rel. Triplett v. R. M. Wade & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Thompson v. Ford Motor CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Jones v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gloria R. Hardy v. Pioneer Parachute Company, Inc., and Parachutes IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
- Jacobs v. Ass'n of Independent Colleges & SchoolsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Krell v. Carolina BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Jacobs v. ASSOC. OF INDEP'T COL. AND SCH.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
- Peeler v. South Carolina Helicopters, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975