Legal Opinion

Krell v. Carolina Bank

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided September 11, 1984No. 0260PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order which determined South Carolina courts have in personam jurisdiction over a bank organized and existing under the laws of North Carolina. We affirm.

The respondent, Mary R. Krell, is the administratrix of the estate of her husband, Roy A. Krell, Sr. Prior to his death, Mr. Krell, a licensed realtor, sold a tract of land in Orangeburg County, South Carolina, for which $7,200 down payment was paid by check drawn on the appellant — Carolina Bank (its Aberdeen, North Carolina branch). Carolina Bank stopped payment on the check. This suit alleges the stop…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Boney v. Trans-State Dredging Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  4. Triplett Ex Rel. Triplett v. R. M. Wade & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  5. Parker v. Williams & Madjanik, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1978

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chicago Eastern Corp. v. ShawSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API