Russell & Co. v. Amundson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Barnes County; Rose, J. Action by Russell & Co., a corporation, against John Amundson. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWallin, J.
This action is for the recovery of the possession of personal property. At the close of the evidence, upon defendant’s request, the trial court directed the jury to return a verdict for the defendant. This instruction was excepted to, and is assigned as error in this court. The verdict, as returned, was to the effect that defendant was the owner of the property, and entitled to the possession thereof. The value of the property was not found by the jury. Upon this verdict, as soon as returned, judgment was entered in the alternative, as follows; “In case delivery cannot be had for judgment in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union National Bank v. OiumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
- Bennett v. . Leeds Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Jones v. City of PetalumaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Bresee v. StilesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
- Harris v. KennedyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Oliver v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- City of Chicago v. OpenheimIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
- Bidgood v. Monarch Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Flugel v. HenschelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
- Van Dyke v. DohertyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.