Legal Opinion

Spoo v. Garvin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 18, 1930PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge "Willis

Affirming.. The parties to this appeal are adjoining lot owners, and the controversy concerns cross-claims for alleged injuries to the respective lots.

Katherine Garvin instituted the action to recover damages and to obtain a permanent injunction to compel Spoo to grade his lot, or to take proper steps to prevent the washing of mud upon plaintiff’s lot.

It was alleged that the defendant’s property was higher than that of plaintiff, resulting in surface water flowing upon the lower ground; that Spoo had changed the surface of his lot, and piled along and near…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langhorne v. TurmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Smith v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Oneil v. HarkinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
  5. Carr v. HannersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keck v. LongoriaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  2. S. H. Kress & Co. v. ReavesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
  3. Pecanty v. Mississippi Southern BankCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2010
  4. Sullivan v. GruskinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  5. Vecchio v. PinkusCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API