Langhorne v. Turman
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Appeal from Boyd Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Ym. Rogers Clay, Commissioner
Affirming.
Appellant, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, operates a line of railway from Catlettsburg, up the Big *810Sandy river, to Pikeville, Kentucky. Appellee, Rachel Turman, is the owner of a tract of land, containing about 4A acres, through which the line of railway runs^and which is situated near the dividing line between Boyd and Lawrence counties. Appellee purchased this tract of land in the year 1902. The Big Sandy Division of the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company had been constructed through appellee’s property for several years…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hay v. . the Cohoes CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Booth v. . R., W. O.T.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
- Sabin v. Vermont Central RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- Blackwell v. Lynchburg & Durham RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Exner v. Sherman Power Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Adams & Sullivan v. SengelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Sussex Land & Live Stock Co. v. Midwest Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Randall v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Gibson v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.