Legal Opinion

Vecchio v. Pinkus

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 23, 1992No. 2-91-262-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEYERS, Justice.

Appellant, Robert F. Vecchio, appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Anita Pinkus, appellee. Vecchio brought suit against Pinkus, Rodman-Farrell, Inc., Gene Brown, and Charles Carlock claiming damages for lack of lateral support to his land. The trial court found there were no genuine issues of material fact as to Pinkus, granted judgment as a matter of law, and severed her from the lawsuit.

We affirm.

Vecchio owns Riverview Property, and Pinkus owns Creekford Property which is adjacent to Riverview. Vecchio acquired Riverview on November 6, 1985, just before Pinkus…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Great American Reserve Insurance Co. v. San Antonio Plumbing Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Farley v. Prudential Insurance CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Whitehead v. ZeillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. David D. Scott and Mary J. Scott v. Robert G. West, Thyra West, Judith C. Clark, Sallie Clingman, Gregory P. Miller, Gaye Miller, Jonathan Bayles, and Amy Bayles, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API