Legal Opinion
Perez v. U-Haul Co. of CA 9/16/6 CA2/7
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 16, 2016No. B262029PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZELON, Acting P. J.—
Plaintiffs Sergio Perez and Erick Veliz Ramos filed a representative action under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698 et seq.), alleging that U-Haul Co. of California (U-Haul) violated several provisions of the Labor Code, including overtime and meal break requirements. U-Haul filed a motion to compel plaintiffs to individually arbitrate whether they qualified as “aggrieved employee [s],” and therefore had standing to pursue a PAGA claim. (See Lab. Code, § 2699, subd. (a).) U-Haul asserted that all other issues regarding the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Discover Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- Gentry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Laswell v. Ag Seal Beach, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Zakaryan v. Men's Wearhouse, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Mejia v. Merchants Bldg. Maint., LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2023
- Contreras v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2021
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.