Legal Opinion
Williams v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 2015No. B261007PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MANELLA, J.—
INTRODUCTION
Petitioner Andre Williams filed a single-count representative action pursuant to the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004, Labor Code section 2699 et seq. (PAGA), alleging that real party in interest Pinkerton Governmental Services, Inc. (Pinkerton), violated various provisions of the Labor Code. In response, Pinkerton moved to enforce petitioner’s waiver of his right to assert a representative PAGA claim, or alternatively, for an order staying the PAGA claim, but sending the “individual claim” that petitioner had been subjected to Labor Code…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Reyes v. Macy's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. MorianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Correia v. NB Baker Elec., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Tanguilig v. Bloomingdale's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Perez v. U-Haul Co. of CA 9/16/6 CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Zakaryan v. Men's Wearhouse, Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.