Legal Opinion

Pacific Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 18, 1922No. 17073PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondents Smith and wife gave appellant their mortgage on a house and lot in Seattle *596to secure a loan of money. This mortgage contained a clause which provided that,

“In case of foreclosure, the mortgagors hereby expressly waive any claim of homestead and all right to possession of the premises during the period allowed by law for redemption. ’ ’

Later this property was sold to the respondents Keith and wife, the instrument of conveyance containing the following clause,

“Subject to all taxes. Also subject to a mortgage to the Pacific Building & Loan Association (being the appellant), each of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hice v. OrrWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Holly-Mason Hardware Co. v. SchnatterlyWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Taylor v. CummingsWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Buchser v. BuchserWashington Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. National School Studios, Inc. v. Superior School Photo Service, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1952
  2. FIRST NAT. BANK ETC. v. TiffanyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Hanley v. MostWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Brehm v. Retail Food & Drug Clerks Union No. 1105Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. State Ex Rel. Burnham v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API