Legal Opinion

Hanley v. Most

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1941No. 28159PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J. —

Plaintiff, Elizabeth H. Hanley, brought this action seeking (1) to enjoin her husband, defendant E. B. Hanley, Sr., from giving away, or otherwise disposing of, any of the property of their marital community, and to enjoin the other individual defendants, Joe E. Most, E. G. Most, and A. C. Bevan, from inducing defendant husband to commit any of such acts; (2) to set aside two voting trust agreements wherein defendant husband empowered defendant Joe E. Most, as trustee, to receive, hold, and vote certain capital stock of defendant corporations, The Copper River Packing Company…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brotton v. LangertWashington Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Schramm v. SteeleWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Occidental Life Insurance v. PowersWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Marston v. RueWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Bergman v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Chase v. BeardWashington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Yiatchos v. YiatchosSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Hamlin v. MerlinoWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Potlatch No. 1 Federal Credit Union v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. In Re Estate of PattonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API