Legal Opinion
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Midland Cooperatives, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 27, 1969No. Civ. No. 69-136PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
Plaintiff as carrier sues the Defendant as consignor for freight charges on eleven tank car shipments of oil from Cushing, Oklahoma, to West Frankfort, Illinois. The case has been submitted to the Court on a Stipulation of Facts and briefs.
Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a Bill of Lading contract on each of said shipments wherein it was agreed that the Plaintiff, as carrier, shall not make delivery of the shipment to the consignee without the payment of freight and all other lawful charges by the consignee and that a delivery of the shipment to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bird v. RailroadsTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Clinchfield Fuel Co.District Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1951
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- C.F. Arrowhead Services, Inc. v. AMCEC Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Carna v. Bessemer Cement Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- Datapoint Corporation v. Lee Way Motor Freight, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Transport Clearing Northwest v. Bardahl Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1978
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Arthur G. Silk, Inc.Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1982