Legal Opinion
C.F. Arrowhead Services, Inc. v. AMCEC Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 3, 1985No. 84 C 6827PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.
Presently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Both sides agree that the only question is purely legal — whether, on the undisputed facts of this case, a common carrier can recover its freight charges from the party which accepted the goods as consignee. Jurisdiction exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1337. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co. v. Jordon Mfg. Co., 750 F.2d 551 (7th Cir.1984).
Plaintiff C.F. Arrowhead Services, Inc. (“CF”) is a common carrier operating pursuant to authority issued by the Interstate…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Commercial Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Illinois Steel Co. v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- LTV Steel Co. v. David Graham Co. (In Re Chateaugay Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- E.W. Wylie Corp. v. Menard, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Consolidated Freightways Corp. of Delaware v. Peacock Engineering Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Western Home Transport, Inc. v. Hexco, LLCDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2014