Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Burlini

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 18, 1983No. Civ. 52706PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KING, J.

In this case we hold that one schedule of guidelines for spousal support may not be used for fixing both temporary and permanent spousal support and that an in-kind division of a community coin laundry business is not required, despite the fact that the business consists of washers and dryers placed in various apartment complex locations.

Dorothy M. Burlini appeals from an interlocutory judgment of dissolution of her marriage to Narciso L. Burlini, challenging the portions of the judgment awarding spousal support to her and fixing the value of the coin laundry business and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re Marriage of EpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re Marriage of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of McNaughtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Campbell v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. In Re Marriage of WinterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Kozen v. KozenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. In re Marriage of Kamzan CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API