Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. Springfield Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 14, 1902PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is a bill in equity to compel the defendant to remove rails laid by it in a portion of Sumner Avenue, in Springfield, and to replace them with other rails of a kind approved by the board of supervisors of highways and bridges of that city; and, also, to compel the defendant to macadamize the surface of another portion of that avenue and to pay the plaintiff the expense incurred by it in macadamizing a portion, which it claims the defendant was under obligation to macadamize. The case was heard by a judge of the Superior Court who found the facts and reported them, and reserved the case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Sioux City Street Railway Co. v. Sioux CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Attorney General v. Metropolitan RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  4. Starkie v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  5. Brande v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Higginson v. Treasurer & School House CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Triay v. BurrSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  3. Boston Elevated Railway Co. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
  4. Lorain Steel Co. v. Norfolk & Bristol Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1957

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API