Visnich v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
The appellants (Virginia K. Casey Visnich et vir), having appealed from an order denying allowance of expenses allegedly incurred by them in a condemnation proceeding that had been dismissed without prejudi'o after trial had begun, thereafter filed (within the time limited by Maryland Rule 625) a motion for a reconsideration of the order appealed from. In due course, the motion for reconsideration came on for hearing before the trial court while the appeal was still pending and was overruled. Whereupon, the appellee (Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission), relying on Tiller v. Elfenbein,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Avirett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
- Tiller v. ElfenbeinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Giles v. DirobbioCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
- United Railways & Electric Co. v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bullock v. Director of Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- Gilliam v. Moog Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Lang v. CattertonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
- Cromwell v. RipleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Link v. LinkCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.