Legal Opinion

In re J.A.M.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 30, 1997No. 04-96-00255-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RON CARR, Justice (Assigned).

This is an appeal from a partial summary judgment establishing paternity. In two points of error, appellant, Francisco Martinez (Francisco), who was found to be the biological father of the child in question, argues that one of the paternity testing reports was inadmissible hearsay and that the summary judgment proof did not support a partial summary judgment on the paternity issue. We affirm.

The record reflects that in 1994, the Attorney General filed a petition to establish Francisco as the father of a child of Judith Dianne Martinez (Judith). The Attorney…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. GMC v. Saenz on Behalf of SaenzTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  2. First Nat. Bank of Libby, Mont. v. RectorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Maewal v. Adventist Health Systems/Sunbelt, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  4. Murdock v. MurdockTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Casas v. Gilliam, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Balawajder v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice Institutional Division, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
  2. Fortis Benefits v. Cantu, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  3. Diers, Jones & Stark, Inc. v. Comerica Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
  4. Fortis Benefits v. Vanessa Cantu and Sundance Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  5. Fortis Benefits v. Vanessa Cantu and Sundance Resources, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API