Bateman v. Bateman
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJames, J.
The defendant filed a demurrer ore terms upon the reading' of the pleadings upon the ground that the complaint did not' state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action in that it was not alleged that the husband separated himself from the wife and failed to provide her with the necessary subsistence according to his means and condition in life or that he had become a spendthrift or a drunkard or was guilty of any misconduct or act that constituted grounds for divorce, either absolute or from bed and board.
His Honor overruled the demurrer and this Court is in agreement with that ruling.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pollard v. . PollardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hyder v. . HyderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Page v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
- Barwick v. . BarwickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Trull v. . TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holden v. HoldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Baggett Transportation Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966