Mikesell v. Wabash Railroad
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marion District Court.— Hon. Jas. D. Gamble, Judge. Action for double value of a mare alleged to bave been injured through the defendant’s failure to maintain a sufiicient fence along its right of way. Judgment was entered as prayed. The defendant appeals.—
1Opinion of the CourtLaud, J.
The defendant’s railroad passes through the farm of thirty-eight acres belonging to plaintiff’s mother from the northwest to the southeast, leaving about four acres on the south side of the right of way. There is a cut where it enters at the northwest, so that the south side is about fifteen feet above the level, and the north not so high. The road is graded up from that point toward the southeast to a bridge or tressel about three hundred feet distant. This grade is about fifteen feet above the general surface. A creek runs along the north side of the right of way and parallel with it. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Asbach v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Yahn v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. ArterySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Small v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Larson v. Illinois Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1894
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shaw v. DuroSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
- Cahill v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Dolan v. HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
- Howard v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1923
- O'Mara v. Newton & Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.