C.B. v. Sonora School District
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION DENYING DEFENDANTS’ CITY OF SONORA, CHIEF OF POLICE MACE McINTOSH AND OFFICER HAL PROCK’S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT (Doc. 58)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of Defendants City of Sonora, Chief of Police Mace McIntosh and Officer Hal Prock’s motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) and for a more definite statement. 1
Plaintiff filed the FAC pursuant to the Memorandum Decision filed on September 22, 2009, 691 F.Supp.2d 1123 (E.D.Cal.2009) (“September 22 Memorandum Decision”). As…
2Cases cited57 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Russell Ex Rel. Jn v. Virg-InAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- L.G. v. Antonio BosticCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
- (PC) Barefield v. AllisonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- (PC) Villareal v. County of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PS) Conerly v. Kaiser PermanenteDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.