(PS) Conerly v. Kaiser Permanente
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES CONERLY, et al., No. 2:19-cv-2535 JAM DB PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 SHARIF TARPIN, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs James Conerly, Marilyn Tillman-Conerly, Carina Conerly, and M.T. are 18 proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with 19 Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). 20 Pending before the court are defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 32, 35, 39, 43, 60, 21 64), defendants’ motion to strike (ECF No. 63), and…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.