Legal Opinion
Feesers, Inc. v. Michael Foods, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 7, 2010No. 09-2548, 09-2952, 09-2993PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
This appeal by Feesers, Inc. (“Feesers”), a food distributor, arises out of a Robinson-Patman Act claim for unlawful price discrimination, 15 U.S.C. § 13 (the “RPA”), against Michael Foods, Inc. (“Michaels”), a food manufacturer, and Sodexo, Inc. (“Sodexo”), 1 a food service management company. Feesers claims that Sodexo was able to purchase egg and potato products from Michaels at a discounted price that was unavailable to Feesers. Following a bench trial, the District Court entered judgment for Feesers. We will vacate that judgment and instruct the District Court…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Federal Trade Commission v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Institutional Investors Group v. Avaya, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. Allen SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Scheafnocker v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Jose J. Loera, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Aerotec International, Inc. v. Honeywell International, Inc.District Court, D. Arizona · 2014
- Patricia Young v. Pleasant Valley School DistricCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.