Scheafnocker v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Joanne Scheafnocker appeals the District Court’s order dismissing her complaint, on a finding that her wrongful levy claim is time-barred. She raises procedural due process issues because she did not receive any notice that the IRS had levied funds she held jointly with her ex-husband. We conclude that Scheafnocker has sufficiently pleaded a constitutional claim with a distinct basis for jurisdiction. Therefore, we will vacate the District Court’s order, and remand the cause for it to consider the merits of her due process claim.
I
The merits of Scheafnocker’s wrongful levy…
3Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by14 opinions
- Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- IHFC Properties, LLC v. APA Marketing, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
- Brown v. Wells Fargo, N/ADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Sherzer v. Homestar Mortgage ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- Kathryn Rothkamm v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.