Legal Opinion

Scheafnocker v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 19, 2011No. 08-2655PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Joanne Scheafnocker appeals the District Court’s order dismissing her complaint, on a finding that her wrongful levy claim is time-barred. She raises procedural due process issues because she did not receive any notice that the IRS had levied funds she held jointly with her ex-husband. We conclude that Scheafnocker has sufficiently pleaded a constitutional claim with a distinct basis for jurisdiction. Therefore, we will vacate the District Court’s order, and remand the cause for it to consider the merits of her due process claim.

I

The merits of Scheafnocker’s wrongful levy…

3Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Treasurer of New Jersey v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. IHFC Properties, LLC v. APA Marketing, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2012
  3. Brown v. Wells Fargo, N/ADistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
  4. Sherzer v. Homestar Mortgage ServicesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Kathryn Rothkamm v. USACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API