Legal Opinion

Jose J. Loera, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 7, 2013No. 11-3223PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, Jose Loera, asks us to set aside his conviction on the ground that his trial lawyer had been ineffective. See 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Loera had been indicted back in 2005 on drug charges. In response to a motion to suppress, the judge had forbidden the government to offer evidence of what the petitioner had told DEA agents after he allegedly asked for a lawyer. After repeated continuances the judge dismissed the indictment (though without prejudice), on the ground that the delay resulting from the continuances had violated the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. John Ashburn v. Jeff KorteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  2. Nucap Industries, Inc. v. Robert Bosch LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
  3. Frederick Grede v. FCStone LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. ArterburyDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  5. Dobek v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2018

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API