Legal Opinion

Gray v. Salem-Keizer School District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 13, 1996No. 94C-10633; CA A86274PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*558HASELTON, J.

Plaintiff, an applicant for teaching positions with defendant Salem-Keizer School District (the District), appeals from a judgment dismissing his action pursuant to Oregon’s Inspection of Public Records laws. ORS 192.410 et seq. The trial court concluded that certain “negative reports” in plaintiff’s job application file were exempt from disclosure under ORS 192.502(3). We reverse and remand.

In 1992, and again in 1993, plaintiff, who has 20 years of teaching and coaching experience in other school districts, applied for positions with the District. Plaintiff was not interviewed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sadler v. Oregon State BarOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Guard Publishing Co. v. Lane County School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Hickey v. SettlemierOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Premier Technology v. OR. STATE LOTTERYCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Defense of Animals v. Oregon Health Sciences UniversityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  2. Oregonian Publishing Co. v. Portland School District No. 1JCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Inc v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Merrick v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  5. Hood Technology Corp. v. Oregon Occupational Safety & Health DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API