O'Neill v. Matthews

— This is an action by respondent against appellant for the recovery upon an oral contract and for the conversion of certain logging outfit and equipment belonging to respondent.

It is alleged in the complaint that, in July of the year 1916, respondent and one Burgess were copart*361ners, and had a contract agreement with appellants whereby they were logging five hundred acres of land in Kitsap county, Washington, belonging to the appellants; that, because of some disagreement, Burgess withdrew from the contract, and respondent succeeded to the rights and obligations of the copartnership, and…