Legal Opinion

Clifford v. Wilcox

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1933No. 24762. Department OnePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steinert, J.—

This is an action to recover for services rendered by plaintiff to defendants under a written contract, by the terms of which plaintiff was employed to procure, or else to collect for, certain corporate stock claimed by defendants to be owing to them. A trial before the court without a jury resulted in findings of fact and conclusions of law favorable to plaintiff, on which a judgment in the full amount prayed for was entered. The defendants have appealed.

The material facts of the case, as shown by the evidence, are these: In May, 1922, the appellants, by written contract, leased…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Greenleaf v. Minneapolis, St. Paul, & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Woods v. WalshNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Hubbard v. Hartford Fire InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. McCallum v. McCallumWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Rohan v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Taylor v. ShigakiCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Cox v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API