Legal Opinion

Griesheimer v. Tanenbaum

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made the first Tuesday of October, 1889, which affirmed a, judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover the price of a bill of goods sold by plaintiff’s assignors to the defendants. There was no question in relation to the price, amount or delivery of the goods.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made the first Tuesday of October, 1889, which affirmed a, judgment in favor of plaintiffs entered upon a verdict. This action was brought to recover the price of a bill of goods sold by plaintiff’s assignors to the defendants. There was no question in relation to the price, amount or delivery of the goods. The only question was whether the goods were to be paid for in cash by the defendants, or by applying the price of them as a credit upon a bill for a larger amount which…

1Opinion of the Court

Potter, J., reads for reversal and new trial.

All concur, except Bradley, Haight and Brown, JJ., dissenting.

Judgment reversed.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. MatthewsWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  2. United States Paper Co. v. GruhnAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API