Legal Opinion
Admiral Corp. v. Cerullo Electric Supply Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 23, 1961No. Civ. A. No. 6842PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN W. MURPHY, Chief Judge.
In this diversity action, plaintiff, with supporting affidavits, moves for summary judgment, Rule 56(a), F.R.Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A., upon its claim, as amended, against defendant for $128,898.33.
“Summary judgment may be granted only if the pleadings, depositions, admissions on file and affidavits ‘ * * * show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law’.” Krieger v. Ownership Corp., 3 Cir.1959, 270 F.2d 265, 270.
In passing upon such a motion it is no part of the court’s function to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kelly v. KosugaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Toebelman v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Parkway Baking Co. v. Freihofer Baking Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Smith v. Commonwealth National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- In Re Manuel Kaplan, Debtor. Manuel Kaplan Arthur Liebersohn, Trustee v. First Options of Chicago, Inc. Manuel KaplanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Aluminum Company of America v. TandetDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1964
- Liebersohn v. Ali (In Re Fineberg)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.