Legal Opinion
Aluminum Company of America v. Tandet
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided November 25, 1964No. Civ. 9534PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAMPANO, District Judge.
Plaintiff, hereinafter referred to as Alcoa, moves the Court for a judgment on the pleadings dismissing defendant Tandet’s Second Affirmative Defense and Counterclaim based on Section 2 of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13. Plaintiff claims the pleadings do not state a violation of the Act since Tandet was not a purchaser from Alcoa and no sale at a discriminatory price is alleged.
Alcoa, a Pennsylvania corporation, manufactures and sells aluminum and aluminum products. Tandet, a resident of Connecticut, individually and doing…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bruce's Juices, Inc. v. American Can Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Package Closure Corporation v. Sealright Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Philip Klein v. The Lionel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- American Can Co. v. Bruce's Juices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Hartley & Parker, Inc. v. Florida Beverage Corporation and American Distilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Harper Plastics, Inc. v. Amoco Chemicals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
- En Vogue v. UK Optical Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- J. W. Burress, Inc. v. JLG Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980
- Roy F. Stough and Quality Merchandisers, Inc., D/B/A Quality Services v. May and Company of Georgia, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Republic Packaging Corp. v. Haveg Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.