Legal Opinion
State v. Cunningham
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 2007No. 2005-1780PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Donnell, J.
{¶ 1} The state appeals from an order of the Eighth District Court of Appeals that dismissed its appeal and held that an order granting judicial release for a felony of the fifth degree did not constitute a final, appealable order pursuant to R.C. 2953.08. After reviewing the history of this case and the relevant statutory authority, we affirm that decision.
{¶2} On September 10, 2003, Kim Cunningham pleaded guilty to theft in violation of R.C. 2913.02, a felony of the fifth degree, and the trial court sentenced her to community control, placing her on electronic home detention for 60 days. On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. HancockOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Davis v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- State v. BeasleyOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. J. C. Penney Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Long v. GeorgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. BradyOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. SteeleOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. NichterOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- State v. GipsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- State v. SparksOhio Court of Appeals · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.