State v. Steele
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.
{¶ 1} In this appeal and cross-appeal, we are presented with two issues. First, we consider whether police officers are exempt from prosecution for the offense of intimidation when accused of abusing their power to interrogate. We hold that R.C. 2921.03 provides no such exemption. A police officer may be convicted of intimidation when the state presents evidence that the police officer knowingly filed a materially false complaint in order to influence or intimidate a witness.
{¶ 2} Second, we consider what instructions a trial court must provide to a jury on the definition of the “privilege”…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. HallOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Toledo v. ReeseOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. PriceOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. RossOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.