Legal Opinion

Special Indemnity Fund v. Griffith

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided October 1, 1996No. 87493PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HANSEN, Presiding Judge:

Petitioner, Special Indemnity Fund (Fund), seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Court order finding it liable for a 6% material increase in Respondent, Terry Griffith’s (Claimant), disability. As its single appellate proposition, Fund alleges the Workers’ Compensation Court lacked jurisdiction to order it to pay an award because Claimant’s preexisting disability, in combination with disability arising from his most recent injury, did not exceed 40%.

Claimant filed his claim for benefits from Fund based on [1] a January 1995, 28% adjudicated…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Special Indemnity FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. Bama Pie, Inc. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  3. Alflen v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Samilton v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API