Legal Opinion

Alflen v. Special Indemnity Fund

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided February 20, 1996No. 85718PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOODMAN, Presiding Judge.

This is an original proceeding to review an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court finding it lacked jurisdiction to proceed in a claim against the Special Indemnity Fund. Based upon our review of the record and applicable law, we sustain the order.

I

On July 22, 1994, claimant Douglas R. Alflen was awarded 33 percent permanent partial disability benefits for injuries he sustained in 1993 to his neck, back, chest, and left shoulder during the course of his employment as a derrick hand.

Subsequent to this adjudication, he filed a Form 3-F Employee’s Claim for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Special Indemnity Fund v. ChoateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Bryant-Hayward Drilling Company v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  4. Special Indemnity Fund v. BakerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Special Indemnity Fund v. GriffithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Rogers v. Mid-America Door, Fire & Casualty Ins. of ConnecticutCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
  3. Samilton v. Special Indemnity FundCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API