In Re Welling
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DISCIPLINARY ACTION
2Per curiam
The ■ respondent, Arthur R. Welling Jr., 1 was arrested for drunk driving twice and for intimidation once ■ in a three-year period. The Disciplinary Commission charged him with violating Ind.Professional Conduct Rule 8.4(b), which classifies as professional misconduct a lawyer’s commission of “a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.” We approve the agreement reached by the parties in this matter and their agreed sanction of suspension from the practice of law. We also impose restrictions…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of MartenetIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
- Matter of StrutzIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
4Cited by3 opinions
- In Re HaithIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- In Re HaithIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- In re WellingIndiana Supreme Court · 2000