Legal Opinion

Matter of Strutz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1995No. 02S00-8906-DI-466PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

This disciplinary action is now before the court on a two count amended verified complaint charging the Respondent with conduct in violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility for Attorneys at Law (Profes sional Responsibility Code) and the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law (Professional Conduct Rules). 1 This case requires us to examine the professional responsibility of a lawyer engaged in business transactions with his client and of a lawyer serving as general counsel for a corporation during a change in management.

I

The Indiana Supreme Court Disciplinary Commission…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bellmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. In the Matter of WiremanIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In the Matter of MurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Seifert v. Dumatic Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  5. Matter of WelkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  2. Gen-Cor, LLC v. Buckeye Corrugated, Inc.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  3. In Re WellingIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. People v. SigleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  5. In the Matter of Arthur R. Welling, Jr.Indiana Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API